Replying to
@ddgulledge
Academic scientific software authors have been slitting each other's throats this way for decades.
You have a grad student re-derive all the features in a competitors software and swear that they never saw the code. You write a paper with a few cherry picked benchmarks to show how your software is the same or better.
Then the grad student leaves and new grants don't pay for maintenance on old software.
This is basically a 5 year cycle.
@pluralistic