Replying to
To be perfectly clear, NFTs are scams and scams are not commerce. I'm not the one to start following if that's what you're about.
Remote
Jenniferplusplus
@jenniferplusplus@tech.lgbt
mastodon 4.7.2+glitch.techlgbttrans lesbian
staff software engineer
devops, reliability, resilience, sociotechnical systems
also, that gay shit
0 Followers
0 Following
13 Posts
Joined November 09, 2022
Google, probably: I have made containers!
me: you've ruined a perfectly good process is what you've done. Look at it, it's got agoraphobia
@JessTheUnstill@infosec.exchange
This is an interesting idea, have you given thought to how it could be implemented? I was just looking at the spec, and that's going to make things challenging. It requires that persistent objects (like actors) have an ID that is a publicly dereferenceable URI under the authority of the origin server. Which is entirely understandable. And I think an awful lot of the rest of the spec rests on the assumption that you can dereference those IDs.
Replying to
@NoraReed@mastodon.social it seems like the answer is yes and no. There's quite a few people around here who take offense at the idea they're being marketed to. Some of them run their own instances. And based on the replies in here, there's a whole lot of people who think there's no space between never saying anything about what you're selling and talking about it exclusively.
As with a lot of things, it's going to depend on your instance and how they moderate.
@hrefna@hachyderm.io @JessTheUnstill@infosec.exchange
If we could depend on people acting like adults, this wouldn't even be a concern 🙃
Of those options, the 3rd party identity/actor hosting seems the most viable. I think it requires the least coordinated change across federating software, and it doesn't require every single person to run their own internet infrastructure or do their own key/identity custody.
@hrefna@hachyderm.io @JessTheUnstill@infosec.exchange That would be great. Misbehaving admins is a threat that I would love to have some kind of answer to.
@JessTheUnstill@infosec.exchange DNS has the advantage of being an outside system.
But I suppose an independent webfinger service could work? Maybe? Webfinger also requires that the object belongs to the same authority as the webfinger service.
That's maybe a more solvable problem.
Replying to
@isucceed@mastodon.online for the record, I'm much more in the tech category than artist.
@jdp23@indieweb.social @thisismissem@hachyderm.io @hrefna@hachyderm.io Yeah, I haven't dug into the logic too deeply, but mastodon does decided whether to forward at least in part on some properties of the http signature.
Replying to
@shauna@social.coop almost zero. It's been such a small fraction that were financially justifiable.