Remote
Andy Kaplan-Myrth
@andykm@mstdn.ca
mastodon 4.8.0-alpha.3+glitchTelecom and Internet lawyer in Ottawa, open access/content/data/knowledge advocate. I work at TekSavvy, but views here are my own. I’m @kaplanmyrth on Twitter and most other places.
0 Followers
0 Following
13 Posts
Joined November 23, 2022
Twitter:
Today, a coalition of independent ISPs led by #TekSavvy applied to the CRTC to reduce the wholesale rates for fibre internet services. The inflated rates the CRTC set in April prevent competition by independent providers. Read TekSavvy's full statement here: https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/coalition-of-independent-internet-providers-asks-crtc-to-fix-errors-in-wholesale-fibre-rates-819788047.html
Open post
Replying to
TekSavvy is the only ISP in Canada (AFAIK) that publishes detailed information about how we handle requests from law enforcement. You can learn more from our Law Enforcement Guide, which includes what info we have about subscribers, and when we do or do not disclose it. https://www.teksavvy.com/policies/legal-stuff/law-enforcement-guide/
8/8
3
4
1
0
Open post
Replying to
@edwiebe@scribili.masto.host It's a Canadian social network built on Bluesky's AT protocol and very focused on Canada, from its data hosting to its moderation policies. https://gandersocial.ca/
1
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Requests from federal agencies remains low compared to pre-2024, at just 2. From 2020-23, the avg number of fed requests per Q was 25; since 2024, it has been under 5. Fed requests dropped in 2024, while Prov requests rose. We don't know why it's happening; changes in police practices? 🤷
3/8
1
9
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Thanks for reading this thread. You can navigate back to the top of the thread here: https://mstdn.ca/@andykm/116851096918319792
Open quoted post
Open quoted post
Quoting
📢 Today, TekSavvy published a Quarterly Transparency Report about requests we got from police and how we handled them.
This report covers the period from October to December, 2025 and as usual, I’m summarizing that report here 🧵👇🏼 I'm also going to repost this on Gander Social for the first time, where you can find me at https://gander.social/profile/andykm.gander.social
#Privacy #Transparency #TransparencyReport #Telecom #TekSavvy
1/8

1
3
0
0
Open post
Replying to
There were 5 emergency requests this quarter, and we identified subscribers in all 5 cases. Average is under 8 requests, so this is a fairly typical quarter. These requests are made in relation to an emergency that threatens the life, health or security of an individual, and are an exception to our policy of requiring a court order. Before disclosing information in response to an emergency request, we establish the urgency of the request and the importance of the requested information.
5/8
0
7
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Our disclosure rate is usually lower for provincial than for federal requests: From 2020-now, we disclosed info for ~90% of federal requests, but 62% of provincial requests. Why? Federal agencies apparently act faster while we still have activity logs, and they rarely make informal requests. For whatever reason, requests from provincial agencies seem to take longer, so we often no longer have information. This quarter, we disclosed information in response to 58% of provincial requests.
4/8
0
8
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Download at https://www.teksavvy.com/policies/legal-stuff/transparency-report/ (now in English and French)
The number of requests and disclosures in this report is pretty typical. In Q4 2025, we got 34 requests and orders, compared to:
59 in Q4 2023
39 in Q1 2024
40 in Q2 2024
40 in Q3 2024
49 in Q4 2024
36 in Q1 2025
51 in Q2 2025
39 in Q3 2025
2/8
0
10
0
0
Open post
Replying to
This quarter, we made no proactive reports to law enforcement. These are when an agent overhears violence or threats. It is never about a customer's online activity; we do not track that. From our stats, we make proactive disclosures about 5 times per year, with a record of 5 in one quarter.
6/8
0
6
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Finally, as always: Sometimes our numbers don’t add up perfectly, or may not be totally complete, mostly because it's hard to perfectly keep track of every informal request, including so-called "jurisdiction requests". These can range from a formal letter from a law enforcement agency asking for information but without including a court order, to a simple call or email. There may be small discrepancies in our numbers due to that.
7/8
0
5
0
0
Open post
Replying to
Oh, since I mentioned Gander, here’s a link to my post there: https://gander.social/profile/andykm.gander.social/post/3mpoefb446c26
0
2
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@teledyn@mstdn.ca Now if by "takedown order" you mean a copyright infringement notice, then this report does not talk about those. This is only focused on how law enforcement gets customer information from ISPs. We get thousands and thousands of copyright infringement notices that we have to forward to users, and only a small number have ever resulted in us disclosing customer information, because the copyright owners don't usually get the necessary court orders. This firm has a list of court orders like this in Canada: https://slclaw.ca/articles/posts/doe-copyright-lawsuits-in-canada/
0
1
0
0
